« December 2006 | Main | February 2007 »

THE THIRD MONK X

A story in more or less weekly instalments - the rest is here.

2cvvan1

I returned from the perilous school run one day to find a Citroën van, the one with the corrugated body like a garden shed on wheels, parked in my space on the square with its back doors open. I braked rather too close behind it and jumped out right into the path of a short barrel of a man with a red checked belly hanging over his baggy cords and cheeks of the same red, carrying a wooden crate full of vegetables. I didn't know we had a greengrocer who delivered. 'La fameuse Kattee?'. He put down the crate and extended a hand. 'Antoine Polizzi'. Jean-Paul's father. My eyes followed the brown cigarette that stayed between his lips as he spoke. He removed it, puffed on it and looked me up and down, then, since I found nothing to say, picked up the crate again with a grin and followed me into the house.

Louise and Antoine had returned, sooner than they'd hoped, for more visits to the hospital, and would be staying for a week or two. She looked paler, sitting quietly on the sofa, recovering from the early morning hours of jolting over narrow mountain roads in the tin-can van.

Antoine took over the kitchen, puffing on his Gitanes, a tumbler of red wine to hand, selecting delectable leeks and carrots from his garden for our meal. They took turns to cook, vying to make us swoon with ecstasy at perfect peasant feasts. Amidst smiles and anecdotes and bursts of song, the fresh root vegetables and salad greens, the saucisson artisanal and wheels of dense rye bread came out of boxes and sacks, filled up the kitchen cupboards and arrayed themselves beamingly, temptingly, on the table.

Louise and Antoine. Long, long dead, their warmth and verbosity and joie de vivre live in my heart. They were unprepossessing, dirt-poor and prematurely aged, and king and queen of food and drink and laughter and each other. On a shelf in the sitting room was a framed photo of them, sitting on a bench outside their dilapidated house, laughing and talking to the photographer, bathed in evening sunlight, the stones of the house, their hair, their clothes all the same golden grey, and in my mind they always have that aura.

For forty years they'd been newspaper vendors on the poorest streets of Marseille, out in all weathers and barely scraping a living. They'd retired at sixty, not long before. Louise elbowed me: 'We got married last year - to qualify for the pension, you know!'. I gaped. of course, Jean-Paul was not called Polizzi, thought no doubt at all, seeing them together, that he was Antoine's son.  It was after just a few months back in the Alpine village of Louise's childhood, happily gardening, cooking and starting to repair the house that had long stood empty, that she found the lump. Bitter luck, and yet they did not seem bitter - just... themselves and here, embracing life to the last breath.

Lunch that day became a ceremony, the first of many, with all of us interacting around the table. Hands stretched, mouths filled, talk bounced back and forth. Louise perked up enough to sharply critique the mustard in her husband's salad dressing. Even in the face of Marianne's fluctuating and sometimes frail energy, we always had formal, well cooked meals with courses and conversation. That was still then the French way. But, with Louise and Antoine, meals moved up a key, becoming delicious, riotous rituals which framed the days. The main course would arrive in a massive, two-handled enamel pot, with ladle, placed with ceremony in the centre of the long kitchen table. With every meal I discovered some dish that was new to me, and some story.  Here was a culture of gourmet sensuality, a great tradition transcending wealth and class - a culture which has since begun to disappear, with Louise and Antoine's generation, but is not yet forgotten. 

Food and cooking had been a deep, abiding pleasure of their life together and of Jean-Paul's childhood and still was, for all of them, an obsession. They tasted, murmured, mused over each dish, discussed the tried and true like favourite paintings and each new venture like a newly discovered work whose attribution demanded slow deliberation and debate.

'And is it true, my dear young lady', Antoine asked, twinkling, 'that in England, when you roast a joint of meat, you throw away the juices and make a sauce from a packet, from cornflour and brown dye?!' 'Ssh, Papa, yes, it's true; it's called Bisto.' (Jean-Paul pronounced it 'Beast-oh'). And so I learned, before I'd had a kitchen of my own and really been corrupted by the base cuisine of my own nation, about food as art, as a ritual of long, varied, moderated pleasures; that a meal was at least three courses, that vegetables were cooked to keep their shape and glowing colours and set on a separate plate, that a starter could be just two perfect radishes with a knob of unsalted butter or a spoonful of grated celeriac in strong-tasting mayonnaise, that cheese came in fine, pungent, nutty or creamy slivers, and fruit was sliced too and eaten slowly with a knife and fork - a refinement that didn't need lots of money, a way of passing long, cold evenings inside and long, hot evenings outside when going out was beyond the budget.

I learned too that none of this was innate, for Marielle and Laura had not yet embraced it. Their taste - indulged, but 'try a little of this too, dear, for Mémé', Louise would murmur - ran to fish fingers and alphabetti spaghetti and  those little, bright-red, mass-produced globes of mild Edam cheese. 'Plastic cheese', said Jean-Paul disgustedly. Marielle beamed. 'My Daddy calls this plastic cheese', she proudly told the village grocer next day. 'It's my favourite!'.

HERE TOO

Heretoo

Fell
asleep with
the radio on,

droning
news from
Baghdad, and dreamed

that
bombs were
exploding here too.

THREADING

Threading

Pale beauty of the
sunshine threading through dark cloud:
midwinter Sunday.

SUITE FRANÇAISE (FOR HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL DAY)

Irene

Irène Némirovsky, murdered in Auschwitz, 1942

It occurred to me that, sadly, there's no more appropriate day for getting around to my belated review of Suite Française, the wonderful novel I read for Patry's Third Day Bookclub - December choice - by the French-Russian-Jewish writer Irene Némirovsky, who died in 1942 in Auschwitz.

I'd been hearing for ages about this great, exciting work and it's amazing story; how Némirovsky, then a well-known and admired writer in France, wrote it in the last months of her life, right before she was taken from the French provincial village where she'd fled with her children and deported; how her two daughters survived, concealed and cared for by their governess with money from her publisher, Albin Michel; how they had this  manuscript all the time, in a suitcase of their mother's things, thought it was a diary, couldn't even bear to read it, then one day the elder daughter, Denise Epstein, now in her old age, did read it, and found it was the first two parts of a projected long novel cycle about the French experience of World War II and the German occupation, and, astonishingly for a first, hand-written, draft, wonderfully complete and satisfying.

The story's interest, poignancy and tragedy alone would have justified the novel's publication and the intense public interest. So I didn't know what to expect. What I found was a truly great, tragically long-forgotten, writer and one of the most considerable novels I've ever read.

I've rarely encountered such a fluent, masterly (mistressly?), convincing narrative as that of these two long, and quite different, volumes, the first recounting the interweaving stories of several groups of middle- and upper-middle-class Parisians as they flee Paris in panic ahead of the German invasion, the second depicting a provincial village under the occupation.   

Némirovsky often cited Leo Tolstoy and the great nineteenth century French novelists as her influences, and referred in her notes and correspondence particularly, for obvious reasons, to War and Peace, and her writing is no pastiche - it's right up there with them. My only criticism is perhaps that the book could indeed be set at the turn of the nineteenth century. I kept imagining the protagonists in pre-WWI dress. This partly reflects, I'm sure, the unchanging, stultifying nature of the social milieux portrayed, but also an absence of the details which would have set the scene firmly in its time. Strange. But it's my only criticism.

I've seldom been more transported and absorbed by any novel, and was much challenged also, for it's a grim reality, a grim view of human nature, that Némirovsky gives. Hardly surprising when you consider - and it's very hard to contemplate - that she wrote down this story almost in 'real time', as her life imploded in the wake of the German invasion and she lived in daily expectation of being taken, the writing, continued until the last moment, all that was left to her.

There are no heros, only frail, selfish characters with feet of clay. Volume I, Storm in June, is an unflinching glimpse of privileged Parisians succombing, in the face of fear, as they flee, to various degrees of outrage, disbelief, cowardice, selfishness and ridiculousness. The motivations of even those least guilty of overtly shameful  behaviour: the Michauds, respectable and relatively humble bank workers, the gentle priest Philippe Péricand and his naive teenager brother Hubert, are ruthlessly held up to the light and exposed as frail, confused, egocentric and dissembling. Volume II, Dolce, puts a French village occupied by a German regiment under the microscope, and neither rich nor poor come out of it well. Suffering peasants, their crops confiscated to feed the occupying army, grieving mothers, lonely young women whose men are away at war, bold resisters: their motivations are dissected and shown up as all too mixed. The central plot of tentatively growing love between Lucille, a bored and desperate young bourgeoise woman whose unloved and unfaithful husband is a prisoner of war, and the handsome, cultured German officer billeted in the fine, stifling house where she lives with her mother-in-law, is all the more moving and convincing for it's evident futility and the flawed, ambivalent characters and motivations of both Lucille and Bruno.

Classically stylish prose and an unmitigatedly pessimistic view might suggest lack of warmth and empathy. But this is not the case. Némirovsky gets gently and subtly inside her characters, with considerable nuance and understanding. Her writing is lyrical too, with poignant and sensual appreciation of natural beauty, the seasons, the gently slumbering French landscape.

It is all hard to take. For me, the breathtakingly skilled writing and shrewd empathy for even the most disgraceful made it takeable, and much more. I found this to be truly the vaunted long-lost masterpiece. It haunts me.

-----------------------------------------------

Patry's review is as spot-on as you'd expect. Commenters on that post link to their own reviews, which are all interesting.  I especially like Jordan's, and she refers to an excellent piece on Némirovsky by the BBC Paris correspondent, Caroline Wyatt, which I had also meant to link to, but had forgotten about by the time I came to write this.

-----------------------------------------------

NOTE: I read it in French. I would not have reviewed the English translation without naming the translator and considering her role. As a translator, it outrages me that this is often done. Doing justice to this long, stylish, subtle and very French work was certainly a considerable challenge to its translator. The English translation by Sandra Smith must be good, I think, because many have loved and praised the book in translation as much as I do the original.

FIVE THINGS YOU MAY NOT KNOW ABOUT ME

Fivethings_1

So Mr TC of Modal Minority passed me this this meme, and I drivel on so much about myself that I'm really not sure, but I don't think I've ever mentioned that:

1) When I was three, I swallowed a large yellow plastic signet ring out of a Christmas cracker. It lodged in the top of my windpipe, or felt as though it had. I can still remember the sensation of gasping and heaving for breath. My mother rushed me to a doctor's surgery up the road, where a blond angel put a firm hand on my diaphragm and got me to stop panicking, and it went down (and eventually out).

2) My junior school was selected to pilot the teaching of French to nine- and ten-year-olds. We had a comic with the adventures of Monsieur Furet (Ferret), the investigative reporter, and a baby that said 'glou glou' - we were extremely taken with the latter and went around saying it at every opportunity. I had found my calling and was regularly hauled up to spout French, shrilly and complete with exaggerated gestures, to visiting county councillors and educationists.

3) For three months one Summer, I worked as an au pair for a family of decadent Italian aristocrats in Naples. Slave labour. The Duchessa and her daughters were huge and drooled and had food stains on their massive bosoms. The sons and husbands were handsome and idle and had mistresses. The baby was just a baby, poor child.

4) Working with politicians for many years, I grew very cynical about their lack of principles and enormous egos. Well, I said I was, but I have a photo somewhere of me shaking hands with Felipe Gonzalez, c 1986 or 7, in which I have an embarrassing curly perm and an even more embarrassing expression which can only be described as simpering with pleasure (No, I can't find it, and even if I could).

5) I had a Turkish boyfriend once. He was meant to be getting a Masters in textile engineering at Leeds University to work in the family business, but was actually writing novels and kept failing his exams and staying on. He was from the far East of the country, with high cheek bones and very dark eyes and untidy hair like matted blue-black silk. He endlessly smoked and drank very strong coffee and fancied himself as a great, suffering romantic. I never knew a more sweet and gentle man, or one more guilt-ridden about being male and affluent middle-class, and about his country. Guilt is pretty tedious, and I didn't really understand it until years later when I'd read more, seen some films, and finally visited Turkey. I've been remembering him in these past days, with the news of Hrant Dink's murder in Istanbul, which Beth and Elizabeth have blogged movingly about; wondering what became of him and what he thinks about all this.

I'm passing this to Udge, MB, Marja-Leena, Tamar and Jude - if you feel inclined.

SMALL SNOW

Snow1

None left lying in the city, but home is higher and colder, and surprised.

Snow3

AND ANOTHER

thing making me happy is my photo on Qarrtsiluni.

Publishing one's own blog is one thing. Crossing the barrier to risking rejection by others is another (and maybe even harder when some of the rotating editors are not total strangers, but other bloggers, known and loved), and it took me a while to do so. And some has been rejected - as you'd expect - and a few things published over recent months. A small step outside my comfort zone. It's never too late.

I particularly love the topic that the current guest editor, Fiona Robyn, has chosen, Come Outside!, and everything published so far. Submissions will be open until 15 February.

HAPPY

Happy_2Having a story to write is making me happy. Happy in a part that mean people, tedium and bloody endless rain don't touch.

Of course, it's not what I'd like to write; it's what I might have written half a lifetime ago. But that's where I need to start, it seems. I have to write it straight and sprawling and obvious, before I can write it askance, original, tightly structured, multi-layered. It's 'work in progress' and in time will take me, I hope, to a group or class where others can help me grow it.

For now, running in the rain to catch the bus, flumping down with a wet umbrella dripping on my legs, getting out my notebook, I can leave the rain behind and enter a sunny village square where a short, round man gets out of a faded red van and walks towards me smiling.

THE THIRD MONK IX

A story in more or less weekly instalments. The rest is here.

I can still close my eyes and see my bedroom, too - a small room at the top if the house, next to Marielle and Laura, up a narrow, uncarpeted staircase, the only handrail a rope slanting up the wall. My first room with a double bed. I sprawled in it, expanding limbs and mind, waking to a patch of sunshine on the bedcovers, through the shutters which I left half open, and the children's black cat, Obélix, sunbathing on my feet. Waking to the unfamiliar pleasure of days I didn't dread.

Padding down the stairs to make breakfast, I'd hear small bare feet behind me, more often than not, and they'd dance around me, warm and rumpled and talkative, as I spooned grounds into the cafetière and sliced the baguette into many little round tartines. On the kitchen table, spread with red and white checked oilcloth, they'd trace pictures with sticky fingers of what they'd be doing at school that day - the fizzing energy of little kids, flowing seamlessly from fact to fantasy, daft to deadly serious.

- Joanne's bringing her costume today. The maîtresse said she can show us.

- She's going to be a fairy.

- No, an angel.

- No, a fairy godmother.

- My fairy godmother lives under my bed.

- Mine lives in the bathroom, in the water tank. She's a water..., a water...

- sprite!

- Sprite, sprite, I'm a water sprite! Laura leaps and twirls, with arms outstretched, scattering imaginary water droplets, twirling into a sleepy Jean-Paul rubbing his eyes in the kitchen doorway. He sweeps her up and spins with her

- My little Laura-sprite! So bright, so early in the morning! He pulls a face at me over her head, puts her firmly on her chair, and sits down next to her, groping in the pocket of his threadbare plaid dressing gown for cigarettes and lighter.

Marielle intercepts Jean-Paul's grimace.

- Daddy's laughing at you!, she tells Laura baldly.

Laura's face creases in distress. Jean-Paul puts down his cigarettes, lifts Laura onto his knee and starts gently explaining that he's not laughing at her; he's laughing at how little girls wake up all in one go and start dancing and singing, but grown-ups take longer, need cigarettes and coffee first.

- Why? says Laura.

- This peach jam is PARTICULARLY DISGUSTING!, says Marielle loudly, feeling ignored.

Marianne would appear from her bedroom only when she heard me chase the children back upstairs after breakfast, and we'd take one girl each and chivvy them through washing and dressing.

It was barely fifteen minutes' walk to the maternelle, even at two- and three-year-old, stopping-to-remark-on-everything speed, but often we left too late to walk. After many nervous sessions in the village back-streets, practising driving on the right and the battered Renault's gearstick, uniquely planted in the dashboard, I agreed to venture on the short drive.

Oblivious to my fear of the mountain road, the back-seat passengers yelled 'go faster, we're late!' and competed to distract me.

- Look, there's Cécile's Mummy in  a yellow hat!

- Look, there's a baby goat!

- Look, there's a baby... crocodile!

At the school gate they piled out and I'd take deep breaths and eventually stop shaking, make a six-point turn, churning up dust, and drive back uphill even more slowly, allowing myself a glance at the golden hillsides, blinking, the sun in my face.

Marianne would be still in her nightie, almost invariably, still at the kitchen table, crumbling a piece of bread, when I got back. 'Getting used to the car?', she'd murmur wryly. It would take her until ten o'clock or so to face the day. Then she'd leap up and throw on some clothes and dash about with mop and duster, briefly the decisive person she might once have been, but soon tiring. By mid-morning, she's be making more coffee, luring me into the sitting room, wanting to talk or to play me a record.

- Moustaki? You know Moustaki? He was a lover of Edith Piaf's. And this is Serge Reggiani - he's an actor - reading poems by Jacques Prévert...

and the sun would climb over the hill while some dark brown voice and soulful words of  gentle disillusion worked their spell on me.

Moustaki, Piaf, Prévert, Reggiani

Moustaki_1Edith_piaf_022Jacques_prevert_2Reggiani_3

GIRL WITH DEAD BIRD

Girlwithdeadbird_2   

I received, by way of a new year's card, this exquisite portrait by an anonymous Dutch master, and I've pinned it up above my desk as an aid in recalling the two small girls I lived with  long ago and whom I'm trying to write about.

The depth and delicacy of it, the evocation of dawning self-consciousness and determined self-containment, the doll-like, but not for that less human, quality - it's so much how I remember them.

The thought of an analogy with a new self-consciousness in the Renaissance artist is a little off-beam, but persists.

They'll have turned thirty now, those two little girls. They're much of an age, in fact, with the sender of the picture. Time and lives spooling round and round and back across the centuries.

Getting to know them surprised me with an inkling that I was better fitted for motherhood than for travel or a career. Had I known then that I'd have no children of my own, I couldn't have borne it. But life is learning to bear things you think you can't, and I'm not so sad, or not only sad, about it now.

Thoughts, returning her limpid gaze.