« August 2006 | Main | October 2006 »

WHO ARE YOU BY?

This is a train of thought that started when I was recently reading A Field Guide to Getting Lost and Wanderlust, by Rebecca Solnit.  I saw her author photo and thought: oh, a face by Memling! - and was therefore enchanted when I found her writing, in A Field Guide to Getting Lost, about Memling, distance and perspective in his paintings.

Solnit1_1 Memling3_2  

I know whose work I find myself in. It's the contemporary Icelandic painter, Karolina Larusdottir. Her surprising, haunting paintings are full of pale, round-faced, straight-haired women who look just like me. My favourite of all her work, I think, is Shedding Old Coats (below).

Sheddingcoats_1 

I was really tickled, also, to find in another painting not just a face but a gesture just like mine in a very recent photo.

Likejeanwholepainting

Jean_1

So, who are you by?

SEPTEMBER PARK

Sept1 Sept2 Sept3 Sept4 September6

MORE ON ANGER

Moreonangerleaf

Such interesting and searching comments on my last post, I feel there's more I need to say. 

The first thing, perhaps: "Buddhism teaches that anger is a negative and destructive emotion", though accurate, I think, would be a somewhat closed and unqualified statement even from a veteran buddhist - which I'm not. I wouldn't call myself any kind of a buddhist. I've spent most of my adult life espousing isms and I'm really no longer very interested in labels. I find many buddhist ideas and practices profound and helpful. Maybe one day I'll feel like calling myself a buddhist. I don't know, and I'm not sure it matters much.

Labels do matter in a way, though. Reading your comments, the disagreements seem to be about terminology, rather than a great difference in experience. What I mean, and what I think buddhists mean (and Dale puts it very well in the comments on my last post) by 'negative and destructive' is unhelpful, unskillful, liable to make things worse rather than better - not a matter of anger, hatred or moral judgement; just: this is what people often do; it's more helpful, more skillful, to try and do this instead.

I couldn't agree more with Lorianne that judging anger, getting angry at myself for it, is undesirable, that there's no change without acceptance and compassion. Contemplating and questioning something is surely the opposite of pushing it away, very far from forbidding it.

I also indeed agree with Tamar that anger is part of our nature. I don't feel that aspiring to succomb to it less often and less blindly is denying that nature. What I was trying to describe is a gentle persistent working with the edge of feelings and behaviour, trying to act more often from whatever small store we have of maturity and wisdom; knowing - oh, definitely knowing - that we'll still often succomb, but even shifting just that edge, even sometimes, seems to me a big deal.

I'm very glad Tamar is researching children's anger and our response to it, including our own anger. I was a very, very angry child myself (unfortunate combination of a sensitive, intense temperament and particularly controlling parents, I think).  One of the things my parents did because I screamed a lot was to take me to a lot of doctors to ask if I was mentally ill (they happened to know a lot of doctors because my mother worked as a doctor's secretary). So, as you can imagine, I have strong feelings about this. By the time I was about seven, I'd received and internalised so much negative judgement from parents and teachers that I'd changed from a loud, assertive, precocious, 'naughty' little girl into a quiet, shy, very neurotic little girl. I think that's terribly sad. So telling angry children they are bad could not be farther from my thoughts. I think adults need to hold children's anger. Some of us may need help with that. Knowing about Tamar's work fills me with joy and gratitude.

And I think that adults can learn to 'hold', contemplate, and sometimes transform, our own anger.  What I find in Buddhism is a deep, clear-eyed acceptance of human nature and a remarkable set of skills for working compassionately and creatively with it.  Encountering these when I'm already quite old and tired, I'm learning and floundering and questioning. So I think I'll go back to doing it instead of talking about it.

ANGER, SILENCE, SPEAKING

Silenceetc1

Last weekend I took part in a retreat at Rivendell in Sussex, with the FWBO. Enchanting place, lovely group of people, tough weekend.

Tough, for me, firstly because this was my first retreat not entirely in silence. Silence is difficult, of course: austere, empty, long. But I can do silence, always find it calming and nurturing. Cultivating quiet and openness, sometimes painful openness, while remaining in communication, while talking and listening between meditation sessions and discussion groups and over endless communal meals: this I knew I would find much more difficult, but potentially a positive challenge.

Tough, too, because the theme of the retreat was Dealing with Anger. Who wants to deal with that? to think about it at all? Even now, my mind slides away.

Buddhism teaches that anger is a negative, destructive emotion - something to aspire not to feel, at all, in any circumstances. There was, in our group, the usual righteous resistance to this. Aspire not to ever be angry? Not even angry about violence, cruelty, injustice and oppression? Surely that can't be right? Surely that will lead to passivity, to not trying to change the things that all kind, progressive people feel must change?

And then there's the struggle so many of us have waged to 'get in touch with our feelings'. Surely it's healthier not to harbour and repress difficult emotions, but to 'speak our truth'? Doesn't unexpressed anger become depression?

I'd already been wrestling with all this over the past few months, as my meditation practice grew more regular. If you keep sitting with yourself, everything comes up: the whole parade of how you're doing in life, the grinding round of miserable habits, all the things you un-remember and deny and hide from and spend years and years building defences against.

The most significant thing I've learned, from a teacher met recently who seems to be a good teacher for me, is the practice of watching emotions arise in the body - the first feeling of tension, disturbance, resistance, almost before you can give it the name of fear, disappointment, anger. Looking for the tiny space where it is possible to notice this. Tiny. Tiny. And the huge difference it makes to become aware, even sometimes, even fleetingly, of that space before falling headlong into emotional reaction.

These few seconds of noticing the feeling arise, examining and accepting how it is, perhaps sometimes even being able to ask, "what is this about? where is this coming from? do I want it?", are sometimes enough to start a transformation of the hot, burning spiral of energy that is anger or another destructive emotion into care for oneself and a space to make choices about the ensuing action. Just a few seconds, so hard to locate and notice. But if you can do it, the effect can be so huge. Not suppression. Not passivity. But more choice about where to direct that powerful energy.

Of course, this is not just huge, but hugely, excruciatingly painful. Who wants to take a look at how a feeling feels, where it hurts and trembles in the body, the deep vulnerability from which it may arise? Who wants to look, especially, at the personal, ingrained, habitual patterns of reaction and behaviour set off by strong emotions? At those patterns, the appalling, shaming, aargh-why-did-I-do-that-again patterns? Certainly not me. I passed a very painful weekend.

Somehow, though, I think I'll keep trying to do this. Because the amazing thing is that although it's terribly painful, it doesn't last, as anger can last. It hurts like hell and then burns out, like the open hurt of a child, leaving a space for choice, and maybe for tiny, tiny change and more effective, less destructive and self-destructive action. This stuff does work.

Rivendellreflected1

I find it difficult to write about this, can't but make something subtle sound simplistic and naive. One of the best things, for me, about learning Buddhist meditation practice is that it's been almost entirely experiential - not talking about it or reading about it, but doing it. Some things, though, are worth expressing. However inadequately.

(RETURNED FROM) RETREAT

Like prayer flags

Prayerflags

Looking closely:

is there anything more painful?

or more beautiful?

THINGS NOT KNOWN

Thingsnotknown11

A light, gentle touch at the base of my spine, and strong, strange feelings shoot through my face, feelings of constriction and release, of something sinewy being realigned. How can this be - in my face? But it happens.

I went to see a craniosacral therapist this week. Something I've done before, to great effect - fewer headaches, more and sounder sleep, more even energy - but not for ages, due to lack of money and, perhaps, too, to lack of belief.

Came out feeling calm, head and neck and shoulders full of a new spaciousness, and so much tension removed from my jaw that when I ate dinner I had to really focus on finding my bite!

This is such powerful stuff - a tiny touch in the right place and huge constriction, tension, blockage shifts. Sometimes I experience this when I meditate: constriction easing out through my face, tension surfacing in my forehead, dropping down through my nose and... gone. The same sensation, but much more powerful and widespread, is mobilised by this therapy.

The cranio-sacral system: sheer quackery, no such thing, much of the medical profession would tell me. Benign attention, warm hands make you feel relaxed. That's all. But this is so much more that that, so much more specific. Interestingly, my new therapist is a doctor, a part-time GP who also practices craniosacral therapy and teaches the Alexander Technique. An unusual and intriguing trajectory, and one I respect.

So much about our bodies that we do not know, that medical science has yet to touch upon. Trust that the undoing of painful tension, letting it go from membranes, sinews, cells, is possible. It is. I feel it.

Footnote: Mizmell's comment below alerted me to sloppy googling on my part. My first link was to one of the two the UK professional bodies for CS therapists, and I thought my second link was to the US Upledger Institute, but it isn't. They are here.

VIVID

Vivid1_2

In the fierce, low light of Summer's end.

A sweet and slightly melancholy time, which, even around the continuing furious activity, seems to generate a surprising calm and thoughtfulness.

Vivid21_1

STILL

River41_2

Still paddling a bit furiously. Trying to be still in the moment and let life flow.

BRITISH MUSEUM

Pose1

Coming out of the exhibition, after gazing at subtle, intricate beauty, everything, everyone, seemed a subtle, intricate and beautiful work of art, all sweet shapes and juicy colours in the soft, strong light pouring through the glass roof.

PLACEHOLDER

Swans1

Paddling a bit frantically this week - no time to blog, or float.